On 6/7/19, 4:16 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/7/19 3:14 PM, Philip Race wrote:
It is that way in the upstream source so I don't think it is a problem.
It certainly doesn't affect the legal meaning to have an extra space.
It is a legal document, so I suggest it corresponds to the original up
to the symbol to avoid any requests from the right holder. I just
luckily noticed the difference.
Is it a big deal to correct the text? Can you explain your point?
I am not sure it needs correcting since it isn't incorrect. I think it
is fine as it is,
but then you wrote yourself above that being the same as the original is
preferable
so I don't understand what you are asking for :
1) remove the space to be formatted as before, but different than the
original
2) keep the space to be the same as the original
?
-phil.
--Semyon
-phil.
On 6/7/19, 2:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Double space in
20 FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
--Semyon
On 6/7/19 2:15 PM, Phil Race wrote:
bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225487
webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8225487/
A 2016 update to giflib brought in a new source file
openbsd-reallocarray.c
We need attribution for this in the legal markdown file.
This update also changes the file to use the markdown ``` ..... ```
convention
instead of <pre> .... </pre>
-phil.
