On 23/03/2020 19:03, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The build tools (small java tools that are run during the build to
generate source code, or data, needed in the JDK) have historically
been placed in the "make" directory. This maybe made sense long time
ago, but does not do so anymore.
Instead, the build tools source code should move the the module that
needs them. For instance, compilefontconfig should move to
java.desktop, etc.
There are multiple reasons for this:
* Currently we build *all* build tools at once, which mean that we
cannot compile java.base until e.g. the compilefontconfig tool is
compiled, even though it is not needed.
* If a build tool, e.g. compilefontconfig is modified, all build tools
are recompiled, which triggers a rebuild of more or less the entire
JDK. This makes development of the build tools unnecessary tedious.
* When the build tools are modified, the group owning the
corresponding module is the proper review instance, not the build
team. But since they reside under "make", the review mails often
include build-dev, but this is mostly noise for us. With this move,
the ownership is made clear.
In this patch, I have not modified how and when the build tools are
compiled, but this shuffle is the prerequisite for continuing with
that in a follow-up patch.
I have also moved the build tools to the org.openjdk.buildtools.*
package name space (inspired by Skara), instead of the strangely named
build.tools.* name space.
A few build tools are not moved in this patch. Two of them,
charsetmapping and cldrconverter, are shared between two modules. (I
think they should move to modules nevertheless, but they need some
more thought to make sure I do this right.) The rest are tools that
are needed for the build in general, like linking or javadoc support.
I'll move this to a better location too, but in a separate patch.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241463
WebRev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8241463-move-build-tools-to-modules/webrev.01
I think this will require further discussion, maybe even an update to
JEP 201. I think it would be useful to see what other options were
exploring, in particular options that organize the tools by module in
the make tree (as it will confuse people to put them in the src tree).
-Alan