The whole point is to test a headful config and in any case  :-

https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.desktop/java/awt/Toolkit.html#getScreenInsets(java.awt.GraphicsConfiguration)

publicInsets  
<https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.desktop/java/awt/Insets.html>
  getScreenInsets​(GraphicsConfiguration  
<https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.desktop/java/awt/GraphicsConfiguration.html>
  gc)
                       throwsHeadlessException  
<https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.desktop/java/awt/HeadlessException.html>

Gets the insets of the screen.

Parameters:
   |gc| - a |GraphicsConfiguration|
Returns:
   the insets of this toolkit's screen, in pixels.
Throws:
   |HeadlessException
   
<https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.desktop/java/awt/HeadlessException.html>|
   - if GraphicsEnvironment.isHeadless() returns true
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

-phil


On 5/15/20, 3:31 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:

On 15-May-20 3:59 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 5/14/20 10:52 pm, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
I believe the test should not be marked headful as no visible component is being shown. Rest looks ok.

If this keyword will be removed then the test will be skipped during our headful testing on headful systems.

Yes, but what is the problem if it will be tested as headless? why there is a need to test on headful systems?
Regards
Prasanta
On 14-May-20 7:44 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 5/13/20 11:51 pm, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Shouldn't we need to use ScaleDownY() for top and bottom?
Also, I think you like to rename runPocess() to runProcess() in the test ?

Right! I have also updated the test from which I copied the typo:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8243925/webrev.05


Regards
Prasanta
On 08-May-20 11:39 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Prasanta.

On Linux, it should generally pass because we already scale the insets there, but sometimes this test fails due to size mismatches, we have some rounding issues during the calculation and conversion from the device to userspace.

It looks like when I commented out the fractional scales I also accidentally
delete the assertion in the test.

Here is an update test:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8243925/webrev.04
The fractional scales were returned, but the test is excluded on Linux. I
will fix that separately.


On 5/7/20 2:27 am, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi Sergey,

The regression test pass for me on windows and linux even without the fix

Regards
Prasanta
On 30-Apr-20 3:10 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk/client.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8243925
Fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8243925/webrev.02

One more place when we return the data in pixels, without
proper conversation to the user's space.

On macOS, this conversion is done by the OS, on Linux we already
convert the data. The only missing platform is Windows. Note that
we still have an inadequate specification for this and some other
Toolkit API which states that results are in "in pixels".

I will file the separate bug to update the spec because this bug
I would like to backport to 11.

The bug was found during work on
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231564








Reply via email to