On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:35:05 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aiva...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> The test fails if OutOfMemoryError is thrown, right?
>>> Is the reduced execution time enough to catch the original bug?
>> 
>> It depends on the system, if it is really slow and just a few iterations out 
>> of 5000 will be done then the original bug will not be caught. If the system 
>> is fast and all 5000 iterations will be done, then the bug will be found.
>
>> > The test fails if OutOfMemoryError is thrown, right?
>> > Is the reduced execution time enough to catch the original bug?
>> 
>> It depends on the system, if it is really slow and just a few iterations out 
>> of 5000 will be done then the original bug will not be caught. If the system 
>> is fast and all 5000 iterations will be done, then the bug will be found.
> 
> I agree with the idea of minimising the time spent to run the test. But the 
> test is useless if it has no time to fail.
> 
> I just ran the test on my laptop with 10+22 where the original bug 
> [JDK-8175015](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175015) isn't fixed. 
> It fails as one would expect. It took about 12 minutes with `-Xmx8m` (less 
> than 8500 iterations). After reducing the heap size to 4m, the test failed in 
> 3 minutes (less than 2500 iterations).
> 
> But the modified test times out after 1.5 minutes and the test does not fail. 
> Thus 90 seconds limit seems too short.
> 
> Shall we increase the timeout to 5 minutes at least and reduce the heap size 
> to make the test fail faster. The number of iterations can be reduced as 
> well, say to 10,000.
> 
> The test runs quickly on a recent build, it takes less than 10 seconds to 
> perform 50,000 iterations. To be precise, it took 5.5 seconds with `-Xmx8m` 
> and a little longer around 6 seconds with `-Xmx4m`. Obviously the run time 
> depends on the hardware and can fluctuate significantly. On the other hand, 
> it does no good if the test always exits by timeout without catching the 
> original bug.

I have increase timeout, but still use the xmx8m, it is the safest value, for 
the less value the java sometimes cannot be started using some options/configs.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/923

Reply via email to