On Tue, 18 May 2021 14:50:23 GMT, Alexander Zuev <kiz...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > The bug is a confidential issue. Either the bug should not be confidential > > or this review should not be done here. > > I do not see any potential reason why this issue might be confidential. It is > not security related, can be reproduced using the readily available demo and > affects a large part of functionality. Removing the confidential label from > the issue. That is what I thought. Anyway, I have done some basic testing and the fix looks fine. It does solve the issue. I will do some more testing and will approve accordingly. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4084