C Y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
| I think we should try to either use names | that are (at least moderately) common in mathematical and other | research as they are commonly used, or in the worst case clearly define | what we are and are not using the word for in the context of Axiom. It | will make it FAR easier for researchers to read and use Axiom if they | don't have to re-adjust their understand of common terms (IMHO anyway). Indeed. That speaks for NOT using 'category' and 'object' when, in fact, we are talking of things that are different from 'category' and 'object' as used in the math litterature. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
