Hi,

Le jeudi 16 mars 2006 à 17:05 +0100, Ralf Hemmecke a écrit :

> Yes, clear, but if I just stay in Axiom, I don't need .o files. Am I wrong?

Yes, you are wrong. The .o file is needed if you want to use compiled
lisp code.


> Aha. And that is also .o? Is this the same object format that comes out 
> if I compile a .c file?

Yes. GCL 'translates' lisp code to C and compiles it with gcc (if your
default compiler is gcc of course)


> I would not have expected anything else, but if someone could make my 
> search space a bit smaller that would help.

You can begin with  src/interp/i-syscmd.boot.pamphlet (search for
compile)


> Well, I simply removed fact.o and started a new Axiom. I said:
> 
> )lib fact
> fact 3
> 
> and got 6 as result. Which code did I execute?

fact.lsp (the code is interpretated).

Cheers,

Greg

> 
> >> That should in priciple be possible once I have libaxiom.al,
> >> I just haven't tried it yet.
> 
> > Let me know if you succeed.
> 
> I'll post my experience with that.
> 
> Ralf
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Axiom-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
> 




_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer

Reply via email to