Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 03/28/2006 08:57 AM, Martin Rubey wrote: > > I believe that the following procedure for patches would be a *lot* better: > > * if necessary, open an issue in IssueTracker > > * upload the patch to MathAction > > This automatically sends a mail to axiom-developer. In case you want to make > > sure, you can additionally send a mail to Tim. > > Why don't you use tla? > > Make a new branch from axiom--main--1, hack at the new branch and if it is > finished, tell Tim that there is something new available ready for merge. Tim > then could investigate that branch, test and check documentation, and if he > finds that it is all fine just do a star-merge to axiom--main--1. Would that > be > bad?
Not too bad, but if the patches are available on IssueTracker, I have the information immediately at hand. I find it easier to look up proposed patches on IssueTracker than via the ChangeLog of tla. Maybe I'm wrong here. It's not so important to me. Martin _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
