> Thanks David, > > But haven't I read in the tla documentation that directories are a > problem. With the procedure you give one cannot rename directories. Am I > wrong? > > The good think is that the procedure is independent of an SCM. ;-) > > Ralf > > On 04/19/2006 05:54 PM, David MENTRE wrote: > > Hello Ralf, > > > > 2006/4/19, Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Now it tells me only, how to send patches of single files to you. > >> What would be the procedure if my modification involves several files? > >> Remember people even might forget which files they actually modified. So > >> how do they find out about all the different files. Would you use a > >> 'tla' command to create the patch? Maybe 'tla changeset'? > > > > Procedure that works for any Source Code Management system: > > > > 1. you have your own modified Axiom in axiom-dxm/ (with relevant pamphlets) > > > > 2. 'make clean' into axiom-dxm/ > > > > 3. checkout latest fresh cvs into axiom/, next to axiom-dxm/ > > > > 4. diff -Naur axiom/ axiom-dxm/ > wonderful-feature-dxm.patch > > > > 5. send wonderful-feature-dxm.patch to Tim and [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Best wishes, > > d.
David's process will work fine. I'll accept whole files of patches or individual file patches provided they (a) are in -Naur format (b) are reasonably well documented (c) are against the latest tla version (d) fit into the system Since I hand review and apply every change it might happen that your patch gets rewritten to work in a different fashion. The -Naur file format gives me enough information to find every individual change. t _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
