Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | "Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | | On Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:12 AM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | | > | | > Tim Daly (root) writes: | | > | | > | yep. it turns off the "tail recursion" noise. bill schelter | | > | and i worked on creating tail recursion in AKCL. This was | | > | just a debugging message at the time. For some reason it | | > | outlived its useful life and continues in the current code | | > | base. the message "exposes" lisp to the user of the axiom | | > | interpreter so i removed it. | | > | | > Tim, | | > | | > Is there a reason why this code should not be contributed back | | > to GCL so that we don't have to patch GCL all the time? | | > | | | | As far as I know this patch is irrelevant | | Great! I'm preparing a patchlet to remove its application to the | silver branch.
Bill -- Here is a patch for it. I suppresed the patch for any version of GCL greater than 2.6.7. Should I be more aggressive than that? Tim -- I nominate this patch for the gold branch. In the long run, I believe we should not construct a ghetto carefully delimitated by myriad of local patches. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
