Hi Bill, ... noweb modifications ...
The bottom line here is that I agree with Norman that modifying noweb's behavior is not the correct solution and that if anything it should be more exact and strict.
Actually, I did not say that I want to modify noweb in any way. To me it was only not clear enough how noweb should behave in such situations. Unfortunately, the website http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~nr/noweb/ is not very explicit about pointing to a nice documentation that describes the semantics of all the various situations where << and >> can appear (non-escaped) in a simple and understandable manner. (At least such a link is not very obvious to me.) I would have to get the noweb sources http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~nr/noweb/dist/ and figure out which of the many files I have to weave in order to find the right documentation. :-( In fact, that documentation situation is very much like in Axiom. All files are literate programs, but it is hard to find a rough overview of the building process, for example. I hope an extended ALLPROSE (http://www.hemmecke.de/aldor/) will some day remedy this situation. I'm not yet there, but I am working on it. All the best Ralf _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
