Hello, As Bill, I think hard-coded modification date is preferable, as it allows minor modification (e.g. fixing typo). Of course, it depends on the semantics you espect on the date.
William Sit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Come to think of it, each pamphlet file should include a revision > history, with dates, much like code. So we should have latex macros > \creationdate, \revisiondates, and \filedate (which may be included in > \revisiondates). Doesn't that revision history belong to the changesets of the Source Code Management system, whichever it is? Yours, david -- David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/FrontPage _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
