Kai Kaminski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > | > | Yeah, most of those conditionals are what make the C code hard to port. | > | > | > | > no harder than the lisp non-portable sutff all over the place in the | > | > Axiom source code. I don't think we have a perfect language match | > | > here in terms of portability. I've coded for longtime in C and C++; I | > | > don't think this particular is stuff is handled the proper way. | > | I'm not going to start another pro-Lisp discussion. But I'd like to | > | point out that Axiom's Lisp code is not representative of (modern) | > | Lisp code. Furthermore the conditionals aren't organized very well and | > | most of them are superfluos anyway, because they are for Lisps that | > | are long dead and forgotten. | > | > Probably. | > | > | > I followed this discussion | > | > http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2006/014309.html | > | > with some interest. | Ok, I read the first dozen messages or so, but I'm not sure what | you're aiming at (IEEE 754 or FFI?). Could you give me a hint?
no, sorry reference to the wrong discussion http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2006/014315.html -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
