"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On September 30, 2006 9:29 PM Gabriel Dos Reis asked: | > | > there exist two implementations of boottran::boottocl: | > 1. one in interp/util.lisp, | > 2. and on in boot/ptyout.boot. | > | > Which one is the real boottocl compiled into the Boot | > translator? | > | | As Jurgen Weiss has pointed out, bootsys is technically | superfluous. The boot translator is include in interp as part | of SPAD. And Axiom can be bootstrapped directly from the | version of boot in interp. (This is the method that he used | for the CMUCL version of Axiom.)
all that is interesting but does not address my real issue. Assume I have an issue with how boottocl works, which version am I supposed to modify? I'm talking of the system as it currently is -- now how it could theoretically be. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
