On October 21, 2006 10:48 AM Waldek Hebisch wrote: > > > There is a better version of Rosetta.pamphlet online here: > > > > http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/axiom--test--1/src/doc/Rosetta > > > > I have previously discussed this version with Clifford Yap on this > > list. > > > > Shall I check this into Silver /trunk? > > > > I fetched the source. Diff tells me: > > --- build-improvements/src/doc/Rosetta.pamphlet 2006-10-21 > 02:54:55.000000000 +0200 > +++ Rosetta.pamphlet 2006-10-21 16:39:28.000000000 +0200 > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -\documentclass{book} > +\documentclass{article} > \normalsize\baselineskip=12pt > \parskip=0pt > \parindent=10pt > > (and another hunk due to missing newline at the end of file). So > it seems that build-improvements essentially uses your version > (except for \documentclass line). >
Hmmm... that doesn't seem significant does it? So you say that the version of noweb that you are using (Debian version 2.10c-3.3) is messes it? It seems to work fine on the axiom-developer.org server which is running noweb-2.11b. The dvi output that you can download from the web is generated by running noweave and latex on this source file. BTW, I have been thinking about changing "axiom--test--1" (which currently is not linked to any repository) to "axiom/trunk" and re-basing it on Axiom Silver at SourceForge. This would allow me implement, for example, a button to generate the output of 'svn diff' of the source for each pamphlet file. This would simplify applying patches from the online source back to the Silver repository but without linking it too strongly to the underlying repository. To update the repository from the online source one could then What do you think? Regards, Bill Page. _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
