root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> Although noweb implements three of four features I don't see it as a
> requirement. Indeed there has been discussion of other formats such as
...
> * latex macro forms which replace the <<>> syntax with
> \begin{chunk}{chunkname}, not yet public.
Can one infer that there is (the beginnings of) one which is private?
Jay
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
