root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
| are you trying to say that silver patches get backported into branches? I'm suggesting that every patch against silver be made as dealing conceptually with one thing, so that branch maintainers can decide whether they want to have them for the purpose of minimizing distance between a specific branch and silver. In the case of axiom.build-improvements, I'm essentially saying that those pacthes that are not disruptive to the build machinery should be backported to build-improvements. Of course, since I'm responsible for that branch, it is my job. However, that job would be much easier for me if the patches to silver were not one-time huge stuff. | that's fine. i'm just concerned that at some point Gaby asserts that | "it's done" and i have a HUGE pile of completely unrelated changes | dropped on my desk. each change is going to be debated (count on it, | given this crowd :-) ), yeah, I know; that is why I plotting to drop it during summer vacations ;-) -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
