> | please lose the notion of "single point of failure" as it is meaningless. > > No, it is not. You have provide evidence for this over the past, > feeling you're obliged to offer aplogogies after apologies.
well, this is your claim. i claim such a single point does not exist. you claim it does exist. it is much harder to prove non-existence of a non-point so i invite you to go first. state where. be specific. prove your claim that a single failure destroys the project. show your work. :-) t _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
