Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | | > Aha! So, in fact we can just remove libspad.a from that list since | | > nothing in GCL references symbols from libspad.a. Is that correct? | | | | correct? i don't know. the C connections and dependencies can be quite | | subtle (e.g. PLF usage). i can't say without checking but at some time | | we, the original axiom developers, or i, when recovering axiom, thought | | that it was needed. i could be wrong. | | We cannot remove libspad.a, because Axiom still needs the definition | of bsdSignal -- which is in libspad.a. | | I'm trying the other way that prompted my question earlier, | i.e. remove cfuns-c.o and sockio-c.o and leave only libspad.a.
Which obviously does not work as Tim explained. src/interp/cfuns.lisp references 'findString' (defined in src/lib/cfuns-c.c) but nothing in the original GCL image needs it. It is odd that we cannot tell GCL "hey, here is an archive for you to look in, in case I later load objects that need some symbols you cannot find right now." -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
