Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| 
| | > Well, patches are supposed to be posted when they are ready for
| | > "prime time" use. For "personal" experimentation we don't require
| | > that (should we?)
| | 
| | Well, clearly "personal" experimentation is a non-issue.
| | 
| | I'm not claiming that anyone has an obligation to share their
| | local changes. Indeed, the license does not require this either.
| | However, working together on a common project tends to imply sharing.
| | But real sharing involves work to "get it off your desk" and into
| | the common distribution.
| 
| This is true in general, including your changes to Gold we don't see
| until the Big Day.  I'm trying to single you out.  We all have local
                         ^

arrgh.  I did it again :-(.  Obviously my fingers again did not obey my
brain when it said "NOT".  Sorry for that.  I hope you deduced that
from the rest of the paragraph.

| experimental trees that would do more harms if published than kept local.

-- Gaby


_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer

Reply via email to