Le mardi 13 mars 2007 à 21:53 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis a écrit : > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Gregory Vanuxem wrote: > > | > I see your question as suggesting that we should have the translator > | > honor the Lisp convention -- that would be the most logical thing to > | > do. If people agree, I can add that capability to the translator -- > | > and of course, I'll document it :-) > | > | :-) > | > | Not exactly, I'm not suggesting something though rereading my mail it > | seems to be. In fact I asked some thoughts because I don't know how this > | should be handled. I like the idea to add support of Lisp special > | variables (*something*) but on the other hand this is a restriction. You > | have to use $variable or *variable*. Don't know what to do, force the > | user or use a more general way via a declaration. > > OK; I believe it is an issue we have to address. Would you prefer > > _*PACKAGE_* : global -- Boot, please, *PACKAGE* is global > callingPackage := _*PACKAGE_* > -- ... do some work ... > _*PACKAGE_* := callingPackage > > instead?
Yes, why not, that could be a good idea I think. Greg _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
