Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | > I can do that. But then we cannot duplicate a directory like
> | > last time or we are going to have the disk space problem again.
> | > But should /trunk be removed first?
> |
> | I think we should *first* merge build-improvements and wh-sandbox
> | to define a new "Silver" /trunk at SourceForge. Delete the old
> | /silver branch as SourceForge.
>
> If we all agree on that, I would like to work out the details
> (which patchsets, etc.) with Waldek so that we can present the
> community with an improved system.
>
> But, I would really like to have a buy-in from the key developers.
>
Yes it would be good to have updated "base". Concerning
SourceForge silver: we probably should ask SourceForge staff
to delete it. Currently silver togerher with "deleted" parts
takes about 200 MB of disk space -- anybody who uses rsync to
get copy of Axiom repository will get all of this. (AFAIUI normal
user on SourceForge can not remove anything from repository
-- old versions stay there forever).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
