Sorry to reply to myself, but I want to record this idea before I head for work:
Worth trying would be to make the "<<" and ">>" references I originally removed from the chunk definition names into active links to the previous and next chunk as the machine would see it. Not in chunk references in code (which should link to the defined chunk) but in the chunk name in the Listing: entry. Wonder if that's legal? I'll have to try tonight. I'll take a stab at a lisp weave function tonight as well. CY ____________________________________________________________________________________ Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367 _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
