--- Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leo supports outlining, but not literate programming (at least not as > I want to understand it).
That was also my impression, that the "fuzzy" aspects of writing for human comprehension didn't map well to the leo paradigm. I had assumed that I simply wasn't "getting" it... > The thing I want to see first is documentation. LP is description of > ideas and backgrounds, proofs, etc. that is supported by running > code. I agree - that's a natural consequence of focusing on writing for human comprehension. > LEO seems to focus the other way round (program text with comments). > ((Oh, I still haven't read enough. You can convince me otherwise.)) I also had that impression. That's why I was hoping for a "paper in Leo" example somewhere. I am curious about a small, new lisp editor called Able http://phil.nullable.eu/ and whether it could be taught to do what we need for Axiom. Unfortunately it's GPL which can be tricky in Lisp... Cheers, CY ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
