Cliff, http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/AxiomSources
that page seems out of date anyway. So why don't you just follow what is written at its bottom?
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/BeBold Ralf On 05/23/2007 06:05 AM, C Y wrote:
Tim, in the interests of simplicity can we reorganize the AxiomSources page to highlight instructions for cvs/svn of Axiom Gold, git for Axiom Silver, and svn for the axiom.build-improvements and wh-sandbox branches? Do any of the other branches contain work not already incorporated into one or more of the above? Are the arch branches now present in Git? If we're moving off of arch to Git, we might want to make this page reflect that. We can put the Darcs and Mercurial links under "alternative distribution methods" or some such, but arch should probably go away unless there is a compelling reason I'm not aware of to keep it. Can the differences in the arch branches be expressed as git branches (or are they already so expressed in your system, if you've moved to Git?) Cheers, CY (Incidently, is the 2005 tarball also the latest Gold release? If not, we should probably fix that...)
_______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
