On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: [...]
| I think we all agree, that the current Gold is axiom--main--1--patch-50 | (and I don't know whether this has another version number like 3.0 or so). | | Silver is something that should be "reasonably stable". Maybe we require | that is should at least always compile. However, it might contain things | that do not work. I agree. | Currently, Tim decides what goes into Silver (which meanwhile became | sourceforge:trunk). | | People should be able do checkout Silver and investigate whether it | compiles on their machines. Whether they find bugs, etc. | | At some point in time we agree that Silver is sufficiently stable so | that it can simply be *called* "Gold". Now a snapshot of Silver will be | moved to sourceforge:gold/Axiom-4.0 and development is going on at | sourceforge:trunk. I agree. | Many people have there private or public branches (which should branch | from Silver). Development there is completely up to them. If those | people think that some idea is ready to be included to Silver, they | should announce it and provide a patch or command how to get the | changeset into Silver. (In my opinion the patch should be a diff against | the current Silver and not against Gold, but maybe I just have not | enough worked in such big projects. I agree on all counts. | Before changes go to Silver, Tim has to approve them. (Actually, to | remove a bottleneck, we should introduce some voting system, whether a | particular patch should go into Silver or not.) Except for the voting system, I agree. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
