BTW, has someone though about where we were now if NAG had given Axiom (including a autoconf build environment) to Tim?

We had something like BI but probably totally undocumented. Why cannot we take that position now. I am sure that if the tests work out fine, why shouldn't we quickly work with autoconf?

I wait for Gaby to submit a patch. I think that will be the better road than simply switch to wh-sandbox and make some people angry. We should stay together as a community. Please.

If Axiom is as well know as Linux then we may become much more restrictive which patches go into Axiom. Then it is time to really "force" people to submit LP patches. But now we should make Axiom attractive!!!

Ralf


_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer

Reply via email to