Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Stephen Wilson wrote: > > | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | > On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Stephen Wilson wrote: > | > > | > | Am I correct in assuming the generated .lisp files are still easily > | > | inspected and modified, and share their own component of the > | > | dependency graph for make? > | > > | > If I understand your question correctly, the answer is yes. > | > | Ok. Just for the sake of clarity, I meant that one can modify the > | intermediate lisp, and have those changes picked up by the build > | process without them being overwritten by a fesh tangling of a > | pamphlet. > > In build-improvements, the .lisp files have depenencies on > .lisp.pamphlet so that when .lisp are newer -- e.g. contained > hand-made changes -- they are not overwritten by the untangling > machinery. Similarly the result of Boot -> Lisp translation > has careful dependency so that hand-made tweaks are not overwritten.
Precisely what I was hoping to hear! Thanks again, Steve _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
