Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (1) -> ?foo x == x + x
> Type: Void
> (2) -> ?foo 3
> There are no library operations named foo
> (2) -> <<bar x == x + x
> Type: Void
> (3) -> <<bar 3
> There are no library operations named bar
Interesting. I'd consider these as bugs.
(1) -> ? x == x^2
Type: Void
(2) -> ? x
Loading /users/rubey/axiom/target/i686-pc-linux//algebra/UPMP.o for
package UnivariatePolynomialMultiplicationPackage
Compiling function $EmptyMode with type Variable x -> Polynomial
Integer
2
(2) x
Type: Polynomial Integer
(3) -> << x == x^2
Type: Void
(4) -> << x
Compiling function << with type Variable x -> Polynomial Integer
2
(4) x
Type: Polynomial Integer
(5) -> <<foo x == x^2
Type: Void
(6) -> <<foo
Compiling function << with type Variable foo -> AnonymousFunction
Loading /users/rubey/axiom/target/i686-pc-linux//algebra/ANON.o for
domain AnonymousFunction
2
(6) x +-> x
Type: AnonymousFunction
(7) -> <<foo x
There are no library operations named foo
Use HyperDoc Browse or issue
)what op foo
to learn if there is any operation containing " foo " in its
name.
Cannot find a definition or applicable library operation named foo
with argument type(s)
Variable x
Perhaps you should use "@" to indicate the required return type,
or "$" to specify which version of the function you need.
(7) -> _<_<foo x
Loading /users/rubey/axiom/target/i686-pc-linux//algebra/UPMP.o for
package UnivariatePolynomialMultiplicationPackage
Compiling function <<foo with type Variable x -> Polynomial Integer
2
(7) x
Type: Polynomial Integer
Martin
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
