--- Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know, never happened to me yet. But one thing is what I like
> or don't like and another thing is how to spend my time effectively
> (i.e. not working on a project, if there is a better alternative).
In the case of Axiom (the original project) there is still no project I
am aware of that offers an alternative (long term goals, rigorous
adherence to and development of literate programming, heavy use of
Lisp, etc.) My understanding is the definition of Axiom as a project
is strongly tied to the GOALS, not so much the current state of the
code base at any one time.
The forks of Axiom share a lot of similar code at present, but I expect
them to diverge more and more as the years pass - their goals are
different. And that's OK, but I can understand Tim's wanting to keep
the Axiom project's eye on the ball, so to speak.
Cheers,
CY
____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!
http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
