>
> fixed 7099: complex Gamma bug
>
> Note that at the value 1.0+4.6i there is a radical departure between
> the table and the computed values in the imaginary part of the value
> even though the real part is exact.
(11) -> Gamma(1. + 4.5*%i)
(11) - 0.004501804477919395 + 4.8078797963506284e-4 %i
Type: Complex DoubleFloat
(12) -> Gamma(1. + 4.6*%i)
(12) - 0.0039079873004091254 - 1.7801308638883733e-4 %i
Type: Complex DoubleFloat
So, value of Gamma crossed brunch cut of logarithm and we have jump
in numeric value by -2Pi. However, the formulas in texbooks (including
Abramowitz and Stegun) do not use numeric logarithm: log(Gamma(z))
in texbooks is a holomrphic function for Re z > 0, in particular
texbook log(Gamma(z)) is continouos, while numeric one have jumps.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
