Bill Page wrote:
> On 3/5/08, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
>
> > I agree to the general statement: there are many problems
> > that Axiom can not do -- most beginers will probably give up
> > concluding "Axiom is too hard to use" and not realize that
> > what they want to do in not doable using Axiom.
> >
>
> I think you need to define more carefully what you mean by "axiom just
> can't do many things mathematicians want to do" and "not doable using
> Axiom".
I would say that from beginers point of view doable means using 2-3
commands. "Interpreter" functions are a middle ground. Going to
Spad is more like "writing program to solve the problem" than "using
Axiom".
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
