>>> 2) If I give the command (for example) >>> )tangle bookvol10.2 >>> then the result is an empty input file. >> >> The tangle command is optimized for files in src/input by default. >... > >I see. My doubt was originated from the fact that last week I wrote a >small pamphlet for a package (eea.input.pamphlet) and > >)tangle eea > >didn't produced any output. This was because I gave a name to every chunck, >always the same but not "*": I thought that )tangle would have extracted >the chunks regardless of the name. >I realized that this was the problem and I corrected it, so I got the >desired input file. > >I must say that I like it very much the new format where pamphlet are pure >latex: this is very natural when writing math. >The previous format was somewhat more clumsy.
The previous format used noweb which has many features, none of which are used in Axiom. I've been slowly eliminating noweb as I rewrite Axiom. One of the steps was to create a latex chunk environment (the latex code for the chunk environment is commented in the file books/tangle.lisp) Once that exists, which is the only really useful feature, everything else is pure latex. That eliminates the "weave" (noweave) step completely. Tim _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
