>>>>> "td" == tim daly <[email protected]> writes:
td> What operating system and version of OS are you using? td> I'll build a machine and try to recreate it. Its an amd64 gentoo box. I built from gentoo's ebuild, updated to point at the 201107 version. Having saved the build tree, I linked that into its build-time location and ran: :; env AXIOM=/var/tmp/portage/sci-mathematics/axiom-201107/work/axiom/mnt/linux PATH=/opt/axiom/bin:$PATH /opt/axiom/bin/AXIOMsys That worked fine. Leaving out the link and pointing AXIOM directly to the location to which I copied the build tree also worked: :; env AXIOM=/home/cloos/axiom-201107/work/axiom/mnt/linux PATH=/opt/axiom/bin:$PATH /opt/axiom/bin/AXIOMsys So I compared the .o files in .../work/axiom/mnt/linux/algebra vs the ones installed into /opt/axiom/algebra. They differ. Something called by make install changes them. I'll try again with gentoo's nostrip FEATURE selected to see whether that makes the difference. It'll take a few hours. The tests take forever to complete. Which reminds me: the failed tests summary is: int/input/ApplicationProgramInterface.regress:regression result FAILED 2 of 5 stanzas file ApplicationProgramInterface int/input/DoubleFloat.regress:regression result FAILED 2 of 13 stanzas file DoubleFloat int/input/GuessOptionFunctions0.regress:regression result FAILED 1 of 1 stanzas file GuessOptionFunctions0 int/input/PlaneAlgebraicCurvePlot.regress:regression result FAILED 2 of 5 stanzas file PlaneAlgebraicCurvePlot int/input/cachedf.regress:regression result FAILED 1 of 8 stanzas file cachedf int/input/dfloat.regress:regression result FAILED 3 of 10 stanzas file dfloat int/input/dftrig.regress:regression result FAILED 233 of 672 stanzas file dftrig int/input/dop.regress:regression result FAILED 8 of 127 stanzas file dop int/input/e1.regress:regression result FAILED 4 of 7 stanzas file e1 int/input/ei.regress:regression result FAILED 16 of 20 stanzas file ei int/input/elemnum.regress:regression result FAILED 16 of 50 stanzas file elemnum int/input/en.regress:regression result FAILED 5 of 7 stanzas file en int/input/gamma.regress:regression result FAILED 4 of 12 stanzas file gamma int/input/grpthry.regress:regression result FAILED 4 of 68 stanzas file grpthry int/input/guess.regress:regression result FAILED 62 of 102 stanzas file guess int/input/ico.regress:regression result FAILED 11 of 65 stanzas file ico int/input/newtonlisp.regress:regression result FAILED 2 of 14 stanzas file newtonlisp int/input/numericgamma.regress:regression result FAILED 7 of 36 stanzas file numericgamma int/input/r20bugs.regress:regression result FAILED 1 of 27 stanzas file r20bugs int/input/richalgebraic000-099.regress:regression result FAILED 2 of 518 stanzas file richalgebraic000-099 int/input/richalgebraic100-199.regress:regression result FAILED 141 of 512 stanzas file richalgebraic100-199 int/input/richalgebraic400-461.regress:regression result FAILED 4 of 324 stanzas file richalgebraic400-461 int/input/richhyper1000-1098.regress:regression result FAILED 4 of 531 stanzas file richhyper1000-1098 int/input/richlog300-391.regress:regression result FAILED 164 of 460 stanzas file richlog300-391 int/input/richtrig000-099.regress:regression result FAILED 31 of 520 stanzas file richtrig000-099 int/input/richtrig800-899.regress:regression result FAILED 165 of 526 stanzas file richtrig800-899 int/input/tuplebug.regress:regression result FAILED 1 of 1 stanzas file tuplebug Most of the test failures with the January release were numerical; they looked to be the difference between the results of fpmath=387 (the default for the x86 abi) vs fpmath=sse (the default for the amd64 abi). That probably is still the case. -JimC -- James Cloos <[email protected]> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 _______________________________________________ Axiom-mail mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-mail
