Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Yes. But I have the impression that so far the compiler gurus did not > | write much mathematical code in Aldor or SPAD. > > Thanks for the credit.
Since this seems to imply that I'm mistaken, I apologize. So far, I thought you contributed a lot to the build system, to analyzing the compiler and the language. These are all things I could not possibly do, I do not have the expertise. I didn't see much algebra code by Waldek, either. (I am not speaking of fixing bugs, he fixed many many many. I was only speaking of the design of new packages / domains / etc.) Still, you probably know that I value Waldek as one of the most important axiom contributors. And I'm pretty sure that, once time is ripe, Waldek or his students will provide important contributions, it suffices to look at his "literature" webpage. Same goes for you. I did certainly not want to insult anybody. If I did, I apologize. I tried to reply to > | The only thing I can do is to advertise the language design of Aldor... > > I suspect that the compiler gurus already know Aldor's design choices. It > may be that they don't want to replicate, or they would like to make slighly > different choices... as well as I could, and obviously, I failed miserably. Just curious, could you please refresh my memory? Martin _______________________________________________ Axiom-math mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-math
