Looks like we have two views: 1. Keep generated code for some samples in CVS and remove the rest, including all that of tests 2. Remove all generated code for all samples and tests and put generated code for samples only when packaging releases
What are we going to do? BTW, I prefere 2. Thanks, Samisa... On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:46:13 +0600, Susantha Kumara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with Roshan to keep the generated source code for some simple > samples. But not for all the samples. > > Susantha. > > > Roshan Weerasuriya wrote: > hi All, In my openion I think for the Samples it is better to keep the > generated code in the CVS, as the name itself implies that these are > samples, so there should be the sample codes/source_files to the user. (It > is certainly true that a user can generate these through the tool, but > we need to make the life simple for any kind of first time user of Axis > C++ so that he will be encouraged to use Axis C++) We have to retain > the first time users of Axis C++, and we auctualy should let them feel > that Axis C++ is not much of a burden to be used. Roshan On Wed, > 2005-01-12 at 16:43, Damitha Kumarage wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:22:19 +0600, sanjaya singharage wrote > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Dick" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" > <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:50 > PM Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs > commit: ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp] > "sanjaya singharage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/01/2005 > 09:34:14: > For a release of course we can proivde the source for the samples > generated > with the tool of that release. Otherwise I guess we will making new > uses life more difficult. True, but they're going to need to generate the > stubs for themselves at some point. Doing this as part of the samples seems > a natural part of the education. (particularly as we'll be confident of > these working first time > and everytime) Yes I think you have a point. As you say generating code > should be a "natural part". Agreed. FYI I have seen some guru saying > somewhere that "when testing with an application for usability in the first > few minutes if you cannot make a sample running successfully then stop > cosidering it as an option." I don't know how true this is. But it has some > thing in it. Shall we get some burden of it in our deployment process and > let new user have some relief. Of cousre he will generated the stuff and go > deeper in the next step thanks damitha > sanjaya. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Dick" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" > <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:21 > PM Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs > commit: ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp] > My opinion is that we should also remove them from samples, certainly > in > CVS. Maybe we need to ensure the samples documentation has > clear instructions for the users on generating stubs from the WSDL. > -- Damitha Kumarage hSenid Software International (PVT) Ltd(Web: > www.hsenid.com) [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lanka Software > Foundation (http://www.opensource.lk) >
