+1 option 1 , and I think what damitha say has a point. Roshan
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 18:17, Damitha Kumarage wrote: > Hi > > +1 for option 1 > Reason > It is very helpful to have all sources in samples even for a developer. For > exmaple while developing, to immediately test the running status of the code I > normally run the interoptest run script to get a basic understanding without > heavy machinary of ant tests. > On the otherhand imagine that when I take a fresh checkout the generation > tool > itself has a bug and not generating correctly!!. In this case if my main > concern is not with fixing that bug , but if some otherthing I was working at > the time then source in samples comes in handy even for temporarily. > > The only drawback not keeping sources in samples is the delay we get while > making a fresh checkout. This won't be a big thing for small samples. But if > there are samples that contain lot of files we can opt not to pregenerate them > > damitha > > On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 17:06, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > Looks like we have two views: > > 1. Keep generated code for some samples in CVS and remove the rest, > > including all that of tests > > 2. Remove all generated code for all samples and tests and put > > generated code for samples only when packaging releases > > > > What are we going to do? > > BTW, I prefere 2. > > > > Thanks, > > Samisa... > > > > -- > Damitha Kumarage > hSenid Software International (PVT) Ltd(Web: www.hsenid.com) > [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > Lanka Software Foundation (http://www.opensource.lk) > >
