On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 22:02, Andrew Perry2 wrote: > The default endpoints in these files point to Java services running on > WebSphere as that is what I was running against when I created these test > property files. These can of course be changed to suit your environment. > The server:port components get overridden by the monitor configuration > which forwards the request to the service located testHost and testPort Ant > properties > > I have a build structure for building the ear files that contain the > services, but at the moment this is IBM WebSphere specific. I am happy to > give this to the community, but it will require a little work to get it > build services for Axis Java. If you only want to see the implementation > code, then that is in there too. > > I'll spend a little time tidying it up and creating a useful readme, then > I'll attach it to this thread. > > Should all these services be stored in CVS? Who will maitain them? Our only requirement is that before making a release all the tests in the test suite pass. I guess that is the meaning of keeping a auto test build. So for all the wsdls there we need implementation. Otherwise we have to assume that these tests are not need to make the integrity of the test suite and verify a release build. Then we have to assume that if all tests that have implementations are passed we can make a release based on those results
thanks damitha > > All the WSLDs are already in CVS so someone could create the services to > run in Axis C++ server. Is this why you wanted the implementation code? > > Regards, > > Andrew Perry > IBM Web Services Client for C/C++ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mail Point 127 > IBM UK Laboratories. Hursley Park, Winchester, Hants. SO21 2JN > Tel. Internal 249828 External + 44 (0)1962 819828 > Fax. + 44(0)1962 818080 > > > > "sanjaya > singharage" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To > rce.lk> "Apache AXIS C Developers List" > <[email protected]>, "Samisa > 27/01/2005 12:32 Abeysinghe" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc > Please respond to > "Apache AXIS C Subject > Developers List" Re: 1.5 release dates > > > > > > > > > > > To run some of the tests the .xml files in > ws-axis\c\tests\auto_build\testcases\tests point their endpoints at certain > services. e.g. > > <endpoint>-e > http://localhost:9080/LargeReturningString/services/LargeReturningString</en > > dpoint> > <endpoint>http://localhost:80/SimpleArray/services/arrayTest</endpoint> > <endpoint>-e > http://localhost:9080/SimpleTypeInnerUnbounded/services/sampleWS</endpoint> > etc. > > Are these tests meant to be run against java services only (at least for > the > moment)? In which case, as I also asked sometime back could we have the > Impl > classes, that is the skeleton classes having the webservice implementions > please, so that we can run all the possible auto tests with ant? > Or is it that all the implementations just simply return the value passed > to > the web services method? > > appreciate a quick reply. > > sanjaya. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Samisa Abeysinghe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 4:49 PM > Subject: Re: 1.5 release dates > > > > Re: > We happened to notice some C++ test files in the > > > tests\auto-build\testcases\server\cpp that are empty. > > > > I do not think that anyone looked into server side testing seriously. > > This is why some files are empty. I think Damitha was working on a > > shell script some time back, but we could not maintain this in the > > long run. So we would not be able to use these files in this folder > > for server testing. > > > > Samisa... > > > > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:40:00 +0600, Farhaan Mohideen > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi All > > > > > > > > > > > > Two days (Thursday and Friday) for the 28th release will not be > feasible. > > > According to our previous release experiences it has always taken us > atleast > > > three working days to get a release out. Therefore Alpha would be > released > > > on Monday the 31st . > > > > > > > > > > > > Having the beta on 11th looks too soon. Why don't we shoot for a final > > > release on the 22nd as stated without a beta if there is no opposition > from > > > the rest ? > > > > > > > > > > > > LSF will not be releasing WS-Attachments for 1.5 as we see that IBM > would > > > not have anytime to work on testing and fixing issues that appear on > AIX. We > > > have the auto build and test server configured only for the Windows and > > > Linux environments. > > > > > > > > > > > > By the way do we have any test classes for "C" ? If you do can you > please > > > check them in ASAP. We happened to notice some C++ test files in the > > > tests\auto-build\testcases\server\cpp that are empty. Is there are > reason > > > for this ? > > > > > > > > > > > > On behalf of Sanjaya > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > From: John Hawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 25 January 2005 17:43 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: 1.5 release dates > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, my thoughts on release dates.... > > > > > > Release [1.5 > http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/AxisC_2b_2b/ReleasePlan1.5] > > > 1. Alpha - 28th January 2005 > > > 2. Beta - 11th Feb > > > 3. Final - 21st Feb. This is because I believe Sri Lanka has a > > > holiday last wk of Feb. I would prefer Feb 28th. and delay beta until > 15th > > > > > > John Hawkins > > > > > > > > >
