I just had a brief glance at the fault (de)serialization and this would need to be substantially altered to support the new fault syntax in SOAP1.2. (While still supporting the old syntax).
The new place for the SOAPAction would also come to mind. We would also have to deal with manadantory headers (mustUnderstand). In terms of the engine the new SOAP fault syntax is the biggest piece of work. Carsten -----Original Message----- From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 5:26 AM To: Apache AXIS C Developers List Subject: Re: Problem regarding SOAP 1.2 namespace I too am not sure of the level of support. However, there seem to be some level of implementation. I happen to run into this version issue while fixing the issue. Looks like handlers can change the SOAP version. But yes, looks like we have problems with 1.2. Samisa... On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:19:11 +0000, John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do we actually support 1.2? I'm not convinced that much of our stuff works? > > > > > > Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 14/02/2005 13:12 > > Please respond to > "Apache AXIS C Developers List" > > > To Apache AXIS C Developers List <[email protected]> > > cc > > Subject Problem regarding SOAP 1.2 namespace > > > > > > Hi All, > I am attending http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-368. > > I see that for the currently used SOAP 1.2 namespace is used it is > said that there is an error from the server: > >When this message is sent the web server throws the following message > >----- snippit -------------------- > > Bad envelope namespace: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope > >---------------------------------- > >which is the definition of the env namespace which is used. The > SOAP-ENV namespace is correct. > > However, according to SOAP 1.2 spec, > http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/, > "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"; is correct. > > I am confused :-( Please help. > > Thanks, > Samisa... > >
