Hi,

sorry for the late reply. Maybe a beta could help to get the
client side improvements out. Certainly worth considering,
IMO.

It is not that the server side is not important, but I do have
some concerns about the current server side approach (There is an 
interesting writeup on 
http://fremantle.org/paul/Web_Services_Server_options_for_Axis_C.html)
and we might need to address the server side in a separate 
release.

Carsten


-----Original Message-----
From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 10:14 AM
To: Apache AXIS C Developers List
Subject: Re: 1.5 Release


Hi Sanjaya,
        We have not attended server side as such. However, many fixes to
serialization/de-serialization in general and code generation has solved
many problem which were generic to both sides.

        We have done some level of testing with C++ server against C++ clients
and about 65% of the tests pass. Some of the failing ones are due to
Skeleton implementation errors. So I would rather say that the code base
is fairly stable.
        I have been able to fix the simple axis server issue as well. Hence my
feeling is that this is above beta quality (compared to 1.4 etc) and we
could do a 1.5 final.

Thanks,
Samisa...

On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 10:27, sanjaya singharage wrote:
> Hi all,
>  
> Are we attending to the serverside issues? 
>  
> How about releasing a beta? but making sure that the client side is
> release quality. That way the beta will offer a snap shot of the
> stable client side for people who want the client features quickly and
> it will not be the final.(However originally in the release plan a
> beta was not talked about). But this does present a problem for us
> over here because we will only be able to test against the Axis c++
> server side.But we need to have the serverside operate reasonably even
> for a beta. 
>  
> I need some time to integrate the services to the ant services
> framework (should be able to do it by tomorrow).and then we can see
> how the serverside is operating. 
>  
> what do you think folks? any other options available? Is it possible
> to go for a code freeze?
>  
> sanjaya.
-- 
Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Virtusa Corporation

Reply via email to