+1 for taking mime bindings into account. Samisa...
On 5/20/05, Mark Whitlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I propose to add in support to wsdl2ws to allow mime bindings in the wsdl > binding so that attachments are described by the wsdl. Attachments are > passed to the client as a parameter on the web service itself. > > This is required by WS-I > http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/AttachmentsProfile-1.0-2004-08-24.html which > says in section 3.4 "Message with no attachments" "R2902 A SENDER MUST NOT > send a message using SOAP with Attachments if the corresponding wsdl:input > or wsdl:output element in the wsdl:binding does not specify the WSDL MIME > Binding" and then gives a doc-literal example in section 4.4 "Referencing > Attachments from the SOAP Envelope". If the attachment is an element in the > wsdl message, then I propose Axis C++ should represent it as a parameter on > the generated Stub web service invocation. > > Comments? > Mark > Mark Whitlock > IBM > >
