I think it is better to leave it to Adrian as he has already studied SOAP 1.2. We can wait for few weeks :-)
Thanks, Samisa... On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 09:56, John Hawkins wrote: > sounds a good plan. > > We've identified a number of areas that we need to look at in order to > support SOAP 1.2 correctly. Adrian is going to look into them in a few > wks time. The biggest area is the fault/exception model. If you get > there first then that's great otherwise you can count on Adrian :-) > > > > > Samisa Abeysinghe > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 30/06/2005 10:34 > Please respond to > "Apache AXIS C Developers List" > To > Apache AXIS C > Developers List > <[email protected]> > cc > > Subject > SOAP 1.2 support > > > > > Hi all, > As I mentioned in an earlier email, we have SOAP 1.1 verion > hardcoded in generated code. > > This also means that we have been always using SOAP 1.1 and never > tested SOAP 1.2 code. (Correct me if I am wrong) > > I propose that we provide and an API at Stub level to set the SOAP > version. (e.g. Stub::setSOAPVersion() ). Then like we do for the SOAP > action in the generetd code, the generated code would not set the SOAP > version if it is laready set. Else it would set that to the default > of SOAP 1.1 9which is the de-facto hard coded default that we have as > of now. > > Value your thougts on this. > Thanks, > Samisa... -- Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Virtusa Corporation
