How about WS::Axis? Since most of your time will be spent on the C++ code, better to stick to that mailing list. Yes, i'd nudge you to use ASL 2.0.
thanks, dims On 7/27/05, Brendan W. McAdams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SOAP::Axis has been assigned within Perl CPAN for this product. > > Avoided Apache:: in namespace only because in perl, Apache namespace > typically denotes a mod_perl specific product. I can request a change > if there is sentiment that an Apache moniker should be publicly noted > in the module naming. > > Two other questions: > 1) Should this discussion move exclusively to the axis-c-dev mailing list? > 2) Licensing - The appropriate license should be Apache License 2.0, correct? > > On 7/27/05, Brendan W. McAdams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In a fit of insanity, I've decided to do this, finally. > > > > I applied for appropriate namespace in CPAN, to at least get the ball > > rolling on that court. > > > > I'm going to start going over code and starting to build a framework, > > possibly based on dims' previously posted Python bindings, this > > weekend. > > > > Not sure yet which is best - SWIG (more compatible with multiple > > languages) or XS (Which I know much better than SWIG). > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > ------------------------------------------- > > Re, Davanum's email from 2004-02-04.... > > > > Folks, > > > > Had a chat with Brendan McAdams (working on Geronimo/OpenEJB) who > > suggested that we could VERY > > easily wrap Apache C++ with SWIG (http://www.swig.org/) exactly like > > Xerces-P > > (http://xml.apache.org/xerces-p/). This will be a good thing since the > > ONLY option right now for > > SOAP from Perl is SOAP:Lite. > > > > Anyone interested? > > > > Thanks, > > dims > > > > ===== > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > > > -- Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
