Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 21:44 -0600, Lilantha Darshana wrote:
IMHO, I would suggest prefixing all names with 'axis2c' makes difficult
to read names.
It should be easy to read and find names by their own. Sometime
searching names by enabling "find whole word only" makes difficult on
having these prefixes. Since we know these code are from axis2c we might
want to drop the prefix, if you do not have a strong reason to use it.
Going back to my old C programming days, it is absolutely critical to
prefix all names with a unique constant .. the pain of link errors is
simply not worth it.
I'd suggest s/axis2c/axis2/g though.
Yes, the obvious rationale for the prefix was the namespace conflicts,
again going along with Axis C++ experiance, where at one point we really
had to go back and introduce namespaces.
I am OK to change axis2c to axis2 :)
Further of using underscores ('_') with often used names needing us
typing two keys in key board very often :-).
Yeah but again its a reasonably widely used model. The other option is
of course almost Java-like CamelCase: Axis2cFoo Axis2cBar etc..
We used the APR source as out master guide, when it came to selecting style.
Sanjiva.
