Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
I am running into several problems while trying to implement the
XMLStreamWriter API for guththila.
Mainly, we need a stack (to push and pop elements), and a hash map (to
validate namespaces)
i think it is possible to implement the same functionality with just few
arrays to record positions for push/pop namespace context and do linear
scan of an array that has prefix->namespace mapping instead of hashmap
- also you do not need to implement StAX xml stream writer instead use
simpler XmlPull.org subset that is more C friendly - for example see
XPP3 (this should be very easy to translate into C - even though code is
in Java the impl uses arrays and it is just one class):
http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/viewcvs/~checkout~/XPP3/java/src/java/serializer_impl/org/xmlpull/mxp1_serializer/MXSerializer.java
HTH,
alek
I cannot use the current stack defined in Guththila as I cannot store
generic data in it.
I have both stack (i.e. push/pop arrays) and hash map in APR, but I am
wondering if the use of APR in guththila would be a good idea.
Otherwise I would have to write a stack and a hash map (stack is
simple but not the hash map :( )
Is it OK if I use APR for Guththila XMLStreamWriter?
Thoughts please...
P.S. I am kind of stuck without XMLStreamWriter in Guththila as we
must have it to serialize OM.
Thanks,
Samisa...
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
Hi,
On 9/28/05, *Samisa Abeysinghe* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi Dinesh,
Any plans to implement the writer API in guththila?
We are very badly in need of a writer API for seralizing in
AXIOM
since writer api need for implement serializing in AXIOM I will look
on it.
thanks,
Dinesh
Thanks,
Samisa...
--
W.Dinesh Premalal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/~premalwd/
<http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/%7Epremalwd/>
--
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
