On 10/1/05, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 08:24 +0600, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
>
>
>>What I would do for the time being is to use APR because I need to jump
>>into serializing ASAP. We could revisit the implementation later and
>>replace APR containers with whatever desired containers.
>>
>>
>
>+1 .. let's stand on the shoulders of giants :).
>
>
I noticed that the pull parser code in Guththila uses strndup. This is a
GNU only method, and not present in Win API.
Hence I used the strdup of APR in the stream writer.
Since you are unable move forward because of unavailability of xmlstream writer in Guththila implementation it is ok to use APR for implementing xmlstreamwriter. Then you could carry development of om But I think its good to keep Guththila as independent implementation.
Therefore I started working on xmlstreamwriter independently but It will take some time. I think Ill be able to implement xmlstreamwriter with available resources in Guththila.
Any comments please.....
thanks,
Dinesh
When doing the coding convention refactoring we got to change these in
Guththila as well.
Thnaks,
Samisa...
>Sanjiva.
>
>
>
>
>
--
W.Dinesh Premalal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/~premalwd/
