Damitha Kumarage wrote:
nandika jayawardana wrote:
Hi all,
For formating function signature , can we use the follwing formatting
eg
axis2_status_t AXIS2_CALL
axis2_om_node_set_parent(axis2_om_node_t *om_node,
axis2_env_t **env,
axis2_om_node_t *parent);
This will make the code look more consistent,
pls comment in this ......
regards ..
nandika
This is cool. In addition for function pointers I prefer the following
axis2_status_t (AXIS2_CALL *add_param) (axis2_param_container_t
*param_container,
axis2_env_t **env,
axis2_param_t *param);
IMHO, it is more readable to have the parameters aligned like the folowing.
axis2_status_t (AXIS2_CALL *add_param) (axis2_param_container_t
*param_container,
axis2_env_t **env,
axis2_param_t *param);
Samisa...
instead of
axis2_status_t
(AXIS2_CALL *add_param)(axis2_param_container_t *param_container,
or
axis2_status_t (AXIS2_CALL
*add_param)(axis2_param_container_t *param_container,
damitha
