I would also like to the relationship between the 1 vs. 2. What is the difference? Benefits? Is one a subset of the other? Why are we doing version 2?
Nadir K. Amra John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/07/2005 07:03:25 AM: > > hi Sanjiva, > > We've got customer commitments on version 1 which make it impossible > for us to help in v.2 - resources...resources...sigh . > > This was the reason why I mentioned the tests. If we could see that > the v2 was close to getting the complete set of tests working and > was reasonably stable then I could make a case for supporting and > thus working on v2. Otherwise, we'd just be swapping resource onto a > system that was less stable than the one we use today while still > having customer commitments. Swapping a team (and customers) from > one codebase to another is non-trivial - and as we give customer > drops of code on a frequent basis it'd be very hard to justify > adding this level of instability to us or our customers . I'm sure > you understand how it works :-) > > Do you think that v2 is going to be able to support ws-* standards > easily - what are your plans ? It'd be good to find a migration path > so we can plan ahead. > I don't see the plans for v2 being discussed in this list - where do > you guys do this? > > John. > > > > > > > > Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 06/11/2005 16:59 > > Please respond to > "Apache AXIS C Developers List" > > To > > Apache AXIS C Developers List <[email protected]> > > cc > > Subject > > Re: Axis2 versus C++ > > > > > Hi John, > > Any chance of some of the IBM Axis/C++ folks helping with Axis2/C? > > Absolute +1 for sharing the test suite (and anything else that can be > shared!). > > Sanjiva. > > On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 11:28 +0000, Paul Fremantle wrote: > > Hi John > > > > We are targeting a pure C runtime with C++ wrappers. Its early days. > > We are just getting the object model and coding style right. > > > > As regards test suites.... sounds like a great idea. > > > > Paul > > > > On 11/4/05, John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > When do you think you'll have C++ going? Are you targeting C > > or C++ first? > > > > what kind of test suite do you have. I'd be interested if we > > could see the whole of the axisCPP *1* suite running against > > it - perhaps we could share test suites? It would save you > > guys a lot of effort. > > > > cheers, > > john. > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Fremantle > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > 04/11/2005 10:32 > > Please respond to > > "Apache AXIS C Developers List" > > > > > > > > > > To > > Apache AXIS C > > Developers List > > <[email protected]> > > cc > > > > > > Subject > > Re: Axis2 > > versus C++ > > > > > > > > H > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Franz > > > > There is an existing Axis*1* in C++ > > http://ws.apache.org/axis/cpp/index.html > > We have only just started on building Axis*2* in C. At the > > moment there is some C# support in Axis2/Java which requires > > you to run Axis2/Java in IKVM under .NET. > > > > > > Paul > > > > On 11/4/05, Franz Fehringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am slightly confused about the possibility of generating C/C > > ++ Code with > > Axis2. > > Is C/C++ code generation possible > > > > - using command line similar to Axis1 > > - only via Eclipse plugin > > - not possible at all > > > > ??? > > > > I am using version 0.92. > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Franz > > > > Dr. Franz Fehringer (Dipl. Math.) > > ____________________________________ > > ISO Software Systeme > > Eichendorffstrasse 29 > > 90491 Nuremberg > > Germany > > > > Tel. : +49/(911) - 99594-0 > > Fax : +49/(911) - 99594-580 > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.isogmbh.de > > > > > > > > >
