Nice looking screenshots!
The IBM team (which I used to be the architect for :-) ) ship the AxisC++ 1.x project as the MQC2 support pack (http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg24009162). I can no longer comment on what IBM's future plans for this are, since I no longer work there :-)
WSO2 are strongly backing the Axis2/C project. A couple of our guys were heavily involved in the creation of AxisC++, but we took the decision that to create a highly flexible asynchronous Web Service engine that supports WS-Addressing, WS-ReliableMessaging, WS-TX, etc, we needed to rebuild on the Axis2 design.
The result is the Axis2/C project, which is just getting to the stage where we have clients and servers talking using WS-Addressing.
So summary:
AxisC++ 1.x is fairly stable project with a team from IBM supporting it to IBM customers.
Axis2/C is a very cool new project with WSO2 firmly behind it aiming to have a 1.0 in the summer.
Paul
On 2/1/06, Samisa Abeysinghe <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henrik Nordberg wrote:
> I'm not sure if this has been covered before, but what teams are
> developing Axis cpp?
> It seems that there is one team from opensource.lk and one team from
> IBM. Are there others?
>
> It seems the opensource.lk team is focused on AXISC2.
Axis2C is not being done by opensource.lk as such But most of the
developers are from Sri Lanka, including myself.
This is an effort to implelemt the Axis2 architecture
(http://ws.apache.org/axis2/0_94/Axis2ArchitectureGuide.html) in C.
The rationale for a new architecture is described in the doc.
Samisa...
>
> What are the backgrounds of the teams, i.e., why are you guys doing this?
> (Which we are all, of course, glad for!)
>
> I guess one reason I am asking is that we have now invested in Axis
> cpp, and
> want to know what lies in the future in terms of bug fixes. We have a
> large
> project (http://sf.net/projects/jitterbit) that uses Axis cpp and we
> want to
> make sure there are people around to look at the bugs we report, and
> if not,
> we'd like to help out.
>
> Thanks
> - Henrik
>
>
