Hi, Ah! I was using the wrong view on Jira, so missed your patch first time round.
I have now applied and tested the patch using our existing testcases without any problems. So it has now been committed and should be available in the next nightly build. I do agree that we will need to revisit this patch when we look at providing more complete support for extension/restriction of data types, including the addition of a specific testcase for this behaviour/function. I will update AXISCPP-918 to reflect the inclusion of this patch, but I'm currently having difficulty connecting to Jira. Regards, Adrian _______________________________________ Adrian Dick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Franz Fehringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/04/2006 15:46:43: > Hello Adrian, > > My fix is contained in my comment to AXISCPP-918 (scroll to the bottom of > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-918). > It consists of only four lines and copes only with the most simple > and special case. > But perhaps someone with the knowledge of you could augment it to a > more complete solution? > For my purposes even this little four lines make a big improvement > (i would have to postprocess several generated sources without it). > > Greetings > > Franz > > > Adrian Dick schrieb: > Hi, > > You mention that you have a simple fix ... is this by post processing, or > do you have a WSDL2Ws path? > If the latter, we would be very grateful if you're in a position to make > this available for inclusion to Axis C++. > > Incidentally, I see from the WSDL attached to AXISCPP-918 that you're using > doc/literal. The latest refactoring basically promoted a few of the > cpp/literal classes upto cpp, incorporating a small number of changes for > the unavoidable differences between doc/literal and rpc/encoded artefacts. > So, I would expect no change in your produced cpp/hpp files (except perhaps > minor formatting), while any WSDL2Ws patch files may need to be reworked to > the new location - but the patch content is probably still good. > > Regards, > Adrian > _______________________________________ > Adrian Dick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > Franz Fehringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/04/2006 09:23:17: > > > Hello, > > With the last svn up i saw that the wsdl2ws sources got reorganized thus > overwriting my simple fix for AXISCPP-918. > So i wonder if AXISCPP-918 could perhaps resolved/remedied for the most > simple cases? > See my last comment to AXISCPP-918. > It would be really great for me, if AXISCPP-918 could be attacked (i > understand well that not all of my issues can be resolved with 1.6), > since this is currently the last and only issue, for which i have either > to patch wsdl2ws locally or postprocess the generated sources. > > Many thanks in advance > > Franz > > [attachment "feh.vcf" deleted by Adrian Dick/UK/IBM] > > > > [attachment "feh.vcf" deleted by Adrian Dick/UK/IBM]
